| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
25/10/2016 |
|
Actualizado : |
25/10/2016 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Poster |
|
Autor : |
AGUERRE, V.; ALBICETTE, M.M.; BORTAGARAY, I.; BLUMETTO, O.; CARDOZO, G.; CASTAGNA, A.; CLARA, P.; GARCIA, F.; GILSANZ, J.C.; LEONI, C.; QUINTANS, G.; RUGGIA, A.; SCARLATO, M.; SCARLATO, S.; TISCORNIA, G.; VILARO, F.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; ALBIN, A. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARIA VERONICA AGUERRE ANTIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA MARTA ALBICETTE BASTRERI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ISABEL BORTAGARAY, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; OSCAR RICARDO BLUMETTO VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GERONIMO AGUSTIN CARDOZO CABANELAS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDRES CASTAGNA DU PRE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PABLO DANIEL CLARA PEREZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FELIPE LUIS GARCIA OLASO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JUAN CARLOS GILSANZ MARTINEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CAROLINA LEONI VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GRACIELA QUINTANS ILARIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDREA PAOLA RUGGIA CHIESA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIANA SCARLATO GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SANTIAGO SCARLATO GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUADALUPE TISCORNIA TOSAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FRANCISCO LUIS VILARO PAREJA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SANTIAGO DOGLIOTTI, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Agronomía; ALFREDO SANTIAGO ALBIN FERREIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Co-innovando para el desarrollo sostenible de sistemas de producción familiar de Rocha-Uruguay: avances sobre la dimensión social del cambio y la comprensión del tipo de procesos de aprendizaje. [Poster] |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2014 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: CONGRESO DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES Y AGRARIAS, 2. "Enfoques y alternativas para el desarrollo rural", Salto (UY): Fac.Agronomía, Regional Norte (UdelaR), 6-8 Agosto 2014. [Poster] |
|
Páginas : |
1 p. |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Palabras claves : |
CO-INNOVACIÓN; SISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN FAMILIAR. |
|
Thesagro : |
AGRICULTURA FAMILIAR. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/6229/1/Aguerre-V.-2014.-poster-CCSS-II-INIA.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01221nam a2200349 a 4500
001 1055885
005 2016-10-25
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aAGUERRE, V.
245 $aCo-innovando para el desarrollo sostenible de sistemas de producción familiar de Rocha-Uruguay$bavances sobre la dimensión social del cambio y la comprensión del tipo de procesos de aprendizaje. [Poster]$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: CONGRESO DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES Y AGRARIAS, 2. "Enfoques y alternativas para el desarrollo rural", Salto (UY): Fac.Agronomía, Regional Norte (UdelaR), 6-8 Agosto 2014. [Poster]$c2014
300 $a1 p.
650 $aAGRICULTURA FAMILIAR
653 $aCO-INNOVACIÓN
653 $aSISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN FAMILIAR
700 1 $aALBICETTE, M.M.
700 1 $aBORTAGARAY, I.
700 1 $aBLUMETTO, O.
700 1 $aCARDOZO, G.
700 1 $aCASTAGNA, A.
700 1 $aCLARA, P.
700 1 $aGARCIA, F.
700 1 $aGILSANZ, J.C.
700 1 $aLEONI, C.
700 1 $aQUINTANS, G.
700 1 $aRUGGIA, A.
700 1 $aSCARLATO, M.
700 1 $aSCARLATO, S.
700 1 $aTISCORNIA, G.
700 1 $aVILARO, F.
700 1 $aDOGLIOTTI, S.
700 1 $aALBIN, A.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha actual : |
12/09/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
25/11/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
A - 2 |
|
Autor : |
ENRÍQUEZ, D.H.; UNGERFELD, R.; QUINTANS, G.; GUIDONI, A.L.; HÖTZEL, M.J. |
|
Afiliación : |
GRACIELA QUINTANS ILARIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
The effects of alternative weaning methods on behaviour in beef calves. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2010 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Livestock Science, 2010, 128 (1-3): 20-27 |
|
ISSN : |
1871-1413 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.livsci.2009.10.007 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: received 14 May 2009; received in revised form 24 September 2009; accepted 10 October 2009. Published 2010. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
The aim of this experiment was to compare the behavioural responses and weight change of beef calves weaned using three weaning methods. Forty-eight primiparous Hereford or Hereford ×Angus nursing beef calves (180.7± 1.3 days old; mean± SEM) were assigned to one of three treatments: 1) CON: weaned abruptly on day 0; 2) FEN: calves were separated by fence line from dams on day ?17 but remained in visual sight of one another; or 3) NF: cows and
calves remained together but suckling was prevented on day ?17 by inserting a nose-flap antisuckling device. In all treatments remote physical separation of the cow and calf took place on day 0. Behaviours were recorded by instantaneous sampling from day ?20 to day ?13, and from day ?3 to day 5, except on day 0. Distance between cows and calves and the fence line in FEN calves and between the dyads in NF calves were recorded from day ?17 to day ?13. Body
weights of calves were recorded on days ?24, ?11, 0, 7 and 21. There was a day and treatment by day interaction for all behaviours. Behavioural responses were strongest during the first 2 days after fence line separation in the FEN calves and after remote separation in the CON calves. For the NF calves, behavioural effects were observed immediately after insertion of the nose-flaps, including numerous unrewarded suckling events, and again when remote physical separation took place. Overall the FEN calves vocalized (P<0.03) more than CON and NF calves.
CON calves played (P<0.02) and ruminated (P<0.04) more often than FEN and NF calves, and walked (P=0.01) more than NF. On day ?17 and day ?16, FEN calves (and their dams) spent more time within 30 m of the fence line than on day ?15 to day ?13 (P<0.02). NF calves spent more time in close proximity of their dams on day ?17 and day ?16 (P<0.001). Calves of the CON treatment had a greater average daily gain (ADG) than FEN and NF calves (P<0.008);
ADG was greater in FEN than in NF calves (P= 0.02). Two-stage weaning with nose-flaps resulted in a second distress response after remote physical separation from the dam, and a drop in ADG in both periods indicating that the response was distributed between the two stages. In calves weaned using the fence line method, the response was more prolonged and more intense, with no advantages for weight gain compared to abrupt weaning. In conclusion, the two
alternative weaning methods did not appear to provide any clear benefits in reducing weaning distress in beef calves compared to abrupt weaning in the conditions used in this experiment.
However, the use of nose-flaps seems to reduce distress better than fence line separation. MenosAbstract:
The aim of this experiment was to compare the behavioural responses and weight change of beef calves weaned using three weaning methods. Forty-eight primiparous Hereford or Hereford ×Angus nursing beef calves (180.7± 1.3 days old; mean± SEM) were assigned to one of three treatments: 1) CON: weaned abruptly on day 0; 2) FEN: calves were separated by fence line from dams on day ?17 but remained in visual sight of one another; or 3) NF: cows and
calves remained together but suckling was prevented on day ?17 by inserting a nose-flap antisuckling device. In all treatments remote physical separation of the cow and calf took place on day 0. Behaviours were recorded by instantaneous sampling from day ?20 to day ?13, and from day ?3 to day 5, except on day 0. Distance between cows and calves and the fence line in FEN calves and between the dyads in NF calves were recorded from day ?17 to day ?13. Body
weights of calves were recorded on days ?24, ?11, 0, 7 and 21. There was a day and treatment by day interaction for all behaviours. Behavioural responses were strongest during the first 2 days after fence line separation in the FEN calves and after remote separation in the CON calves. For the NF calves, behavioural effects were observed immediately after insertion of the nose-flaps, including numerous unrewarded suckling events, and again when remote physical separation took place. Overall the FEN calves vocalized (P<0.03) more than CON and NF calves.
CON calves played (P<0.02... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
BEEF CATTLE; BEHAVIOUR; CALVES; STRESS; WEANING. |
|
Thesagro : |
COMPORTAMIENTO; DESTETE; ESTRES; GANADO VACUNO; TERNEROS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
--
L02 Alimentación animal |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/4478/1/Quintans-arb-2010-4.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03613naa a2200325 a 4500
001 1012823
005 2019-11-25
008 2010 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1871-1413
024 7 $a10.1016/j.livsci.2009.10.007$2DOI
100 1 $aENRÍQUEZ, D.H.
245 $aThe effects of alternative weaning methods on behaviour in beef calves.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2010
500 $aArticle history: received 14 May 2009; received in revised form 24 September 2009; accepted 10 October 2009. Published 2010.
520 $aAbstract: The aim of this experiment was to compare the behavioural responses and weight change of beef calves weaned using three weaning methods. Forty-eight primiparous Hereford or Hereford ×Angus nursing beef calves (180.7± 1.3 days old; mean± SEM) were assigned to one of three treatments: 1) CON: weaned abruptly on day 0; 2) FEN: calves were separated by fence line from dams on day ?17 but remained in visual sight of one another; or 3) NF: cows and calves remained together but suckling was prevented on day ?17 by inserting a nose-flap antisuckling device. In all treatments remote physical separation of the cow and calf took place on day 0. Behaviours were recorded by instantaneous sampling from day ?20 to day ?13, and from day ?3 to day 5, except on day 0. Distance between cows and calves and the fence line in FEN calves and between the dyads in NF calves were recorded from day ?17 to day ?13. Body weights of calves were recorded on days ?24, ?11, 0, 7 and 21. There was a day and treatment by day interaction for all behaviours. Behavioural responses were strongest during the first 2 days after fence line separation in the FEN calves and after remote separation in the CON calves. For the NF calves, behavioural effects were observed immediately after insertion of the nose-flaps, including numerous unrewarded suckling events, and again when remote physical separation took place. Overall the FEN calves vocalized (P<0.03) more than CON and NF calves. CON calves played (P<0.02) and ruminated (P<0.04) more often than FEN and NF calves, and walked (P=0.01) more than NF. On day ?17 and day ?16, FEN calves (and their dams) spent more time within 30 m of the fence line than on day ?15 to day ?13 (P<0.02). NF calves spent more time in close proximity of their dams on day ?17 and day ?16 (P<0.001). Calves of the CON treatment had a greater average daily gain (ADG) than FEN and NF calves (P<0.008); ADG was greater in FEN than in NF calves (P= 0.02). Two-stage weaning with nose-flaps resulted in a second distress response after remote physical separation from the dam, and a drop in ADG in both periods indicating that the response was distributed between the two stages. In calves weaned using the fence line method, the response was more prolonged and more intense, with no advantages for weight gain compared to abrupt weaning. In conclusion, the two alternative weaning methods did not appear to provide any clear benefits in reducing weaning distress in beef calves compared to abrupt weaning in the conditions used in this experiment. However, the use of nose-flaps seems to reduce distress better than fence line separation.
650 $aCOMPORTAMIENTO
650 $aDESTETE
650 $aESTRES
650 $aGANADO VACUNO
650 $aTERNEROS
653 $aBEEF CATTLE
653 $aBEHAVIOUR
653 $aCALVES
653 $aSTRESS
653 $aWEANING
700 1 $aUNGERFELD, R.
700 1 $aQUINTANS, G.
700 1 $aGUIDONI, A.L.
700 1 $aHÖTZEL, M.J.
773 $tLivestock Science, 2010, 128 (1-3): 20-27
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
